Smith v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
Appellants, Concept Planners & Designers and Aetna Casualty Company, request that we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court and issue an order dismissing the petitions of Eddie Smith requesting modification and reinstatement of benefits and attorney’s fees and penalties under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1
Claimant was employed as a carpenter by Concept Planners & Designers when he sustained a work-related injury to his lower back. Claimant received compensation for a closed period from May 14, 1973 until September 12, 1973, when…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- McDevitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Gilbert, R. v. Synagro Central ApltsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Jonathan Sheppard Stables v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.