Legal Opinion

Bates v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*161OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.1

Claimant Barry Bates petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), which, inter alia, granted claimant’s penalty petition against employer, Titan Construction Staffing, LLC and its workers’ compensation insurer, the State Workers’ Insurance Fund (SWIF),2 but denied counsel fees based upon a finding that employer’s contest of the penalty petition was reasonable. At issue is whether employer’s contest of claimant’s penalty petition was per se unreasonable as a matter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Elite Carpentry Contractors & General Accident Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Body Shop v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Department of Public Welfare v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hough v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Jordan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Whitmoyer v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Lebanon Valley Brethren Home v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Delarosa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API