Goodman v. Jonas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Plaintiff initiated an action comprising two counts: (1) for declaratory relief regarding the construction of a lease; and (2) for damages caused by defendants’ fraudulent misrepresentation in inducing him to make the lease. The appeal is from those portions of the judgment which (a) construe the reciprocal rights and obligations of the parties under the lease, and (b) deny damages for fraud. Plaintiff will be subsequently referred to as Goodman and defendants 1 as Jonas.
Defendant Jonas had been engaged in the manufacture of various types of furniture for about 20 years prior to 1953. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Knox v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Cameron v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Fricke v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Teipel v. Southern Nevada Vending Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Flynn v. MikelianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wright v. Coberly-West Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Purity Stores, Ltd. v. Linda Mar Shopping Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.