Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Cameron

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1948No. Civ. 16215, 16471PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

The only question necessary to be decided in this case is whether the judgment setting aside, on the grounds of fraud and misrepresentation, the property settlement agreement entered into between plaintiff and defendant is sustained by the evidence.

Plaintiff and defendant married in January, 1923, and separated in May, 1941. After separation the parties began negotiations through their respective attorneys for a property settlement. For a short time plaintiff had as her attorney Mr. John G. Clock of the firm of Clock, Waestman and Clock. After he was discharged by plaintiff she employed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cameron v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Collins v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re Marriage of ElkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API