Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Mikelian

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1962No. Civ. 25915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The primary question involved on this appeal is the nature of the rights of the plaintiffs, assignors of a lease of real property, at the time of the acts of the defendant lessor of which complaint is made. The appeal is from a judgment for the defendant.

On November 6, 1957, the defendant leased the premises involved to certain persons who thereafter assigned the lease to Zelman Soskin. On July 2, 1958, Soskin sold the business being operated on the property to the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Flynn, and assigned the lease to them. The lease contained a provision which was in part as follows:…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Barkhaus v. Producers Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bevelheimer v. GierachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Olin v. GoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Italian Fisherman, Inc. v. MiddlemasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Kelly v. Tri-Cities Broadcasting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API