Legal Opinion

California Indemnity Insurance Premium Finance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1995No. A068421PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

This appeal raises a difficult legal issue from the arcane world of insurance premium financing. When an insurance agent arranges a fraudulent insurance premium financing transaction for an insured which purports to be—but is not—authorized or ratified by the insured, is the risk of liability for the insured’s subsequent loss of premium borne by the insurer issuing the original policy to the insured? Or is this risk borne by the lender relying on that agent’s purported but fraudulent authorization in financing the policy premium?

We conclude the trial court properly found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Alliance Acceptance Co. v. Yale Insurance Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Gibson v. Government Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Taylor-Rush v. Multitech Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Conservatorship of LevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Conservatorship of LevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. In re K.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API