Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 13, 1951No. 21395_1PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
By a divided vote we decided this appeal last year upon the same record that is now before us,1 holding that the Board’s order ¡mould be “enforced.” The Supreme Court vacated our order and -remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in two particulars.2 The first was that, athough the amendment of the old act was in terms limited to adding that courts of appeal should scrutinize the whole record on reviewing findings of the Board, its implications were more extended. The second was that in considering whether the Board’s findings were adequately supported by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
3Cited by75 opinions
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.