Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 24, 1952No. 22421_1PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. We think that, on the record as a whole, the evidence supports the findings of fact which in turn justify the Board’s legal conclusions and order. Respondent offered no proof concerning the percentage of its employees who were union members on July 21, 1950. Absent such proof, the fact that, in the circumstances, more than 90% of those discharged on that date were members of the union suffices to make not unreasonable the Board’s inference that respondent discriminated against union members, and that the discharges on that par-' ticular date were not caused by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Havana Madrid Restaurant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Perry v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Tu Lin v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Shunfu Li v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Vidal Galdon Aquino, Government of the Virgin Islands v. Ishmael Guillerma ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.