Legal Opinion
Willard v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 4, 1990No. 69347PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
On affirmance of summary judgment for the insured, the insurer urges on certiorari that the evidentiary materials in the record support but a single inference — that the harm for which recovery is sought did not “arise out of the use of an uninsured automobile.” Although we reject the insurer’s proposition, we reverse the summary judgment and remand this cause for trial.
T.
ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
A
The facts affecting the claim
While on patrol, police officer George Ray Willard spotted a vehicle driven by *1126then-suspected armed robber, Mark Wesley Kelley. As Willard…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Spirgis v. Circle K Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.