Harless v. Winter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Each of these listed actions in partition, under section 752 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was brought by plaintiff as owner of unforeclosed street improvement bonds issued by the city treasurer of San Diego pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911. The complaint in each ease was filed in 1949. It is stipulated by the parties that insofar as the law is concerned, the facts in each and all of the above actions are identical. More than four years had expired after the due date of said bonds or the last installment due thereon or of the last principal coupon attached thereto prior to the filing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Sponogle v. CurnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Elbert, Ltd. v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Paules v. Elbert, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Harless v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953