Legal Opinion

Franco v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 07-6039 (SRC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the renewed motion for class certification filed on September 9, 2013 by Plaintiffs Darlery Franco, David Chazen and Camilo Nelson (collectively, “Subscriber Plaintiffs”). Cigna has opposed the motion. The Court denied Subscriber Plaintiffs’ first motion for class certification by Order dated January 16, 2013. The Opinion issued by the Court in connection with that Order provides a detailed factual background and defines key terms that likewise apply to this motion, for example “ONET” and “UCR.” Because the Court writes…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. ERHART v. PLASTER LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUNDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  3. MAYER v. AETNA INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API