Legal Opinion
ERHART v. PLASTER LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUND
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 26, 2019No. 1:19-cv-06812Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : William ERHART, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil No. 19-6812 (RBK/AMD) : v. : OPINION : PLASTERERS LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUND, : et al., : : Defendants. : : KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (Docket Item 4). For the reasons expressed in the Opinion below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs in this case are William Erhart (“Erhart”), Colleen Erhart (“Ms. Erhart”), Thomas Cox (“Cox”), Arthur Crandell (“Crandell”),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.