Legal Opinion
Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1996No. 96 Civ. 1664 (DNE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs move this Court to extend plaintiffs’ time to respond to defendants’ respective motions to dismiss, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b). Because this motion is not properly before this Court, the motion is denied.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys, Aldo E. Botti (“Bot-ti”), Peter M. DeLongis (“DeLongis”), and Ronald D. Menna (“Menna”) (collectively “plaintiffs’ attorneys” or “plaintiffs’ counsel”) have also applied to this Court to be admitted pro hac vice. Because plaintiffs’ attorneys have demonstrated a serious lack…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Mtr. of Ny County Lawyers Assn.(roel)New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- In Re PetersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Erbacci v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Kampitch v. LachDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
- AML IP, LLC v. Aero Global, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Ave. V Gourmet Deli Corp. v. United States of America, et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.