Legal Opinion
Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 1996No. 96 Civ. 1664 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Currently before the Court are six motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b) to dismiss plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. These motions are brought respectively by defendants the United States of America (“the Government”), Charles M. Carberry as Investigations Officer (“Carberry”), Frederick B. Lacey as Independent Administrator (“Lacey”), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”), IBT Local 738 (“Local 738”), and IBT Local 726 (“Local 726”). 1 Defendant IBT Local 727 Health and Welfare Fund has made no response to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lettis v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Aryai v. Forfeiture Support Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Manchester Mfg. v. SearsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997