Legal Opinion

AML IP, LLC v. Aero Global, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 18, 2025No. 1:23-cv-11264Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AML IP, LLC, Plaintiff, 23 Civ. 11264 (DEH) v. OPINION AERO GLOBAL, LLC, AND ORDER Defendant. DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: Currently before the Court is Defendant Aero Global’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the Court’s inherent authority. ECF No. 49. Aero Global seeks to recover attorney’s fees and costs from Plaintiff AML on the grounds that this case is “exceptional” within the meaning of

35 U.S.C. § 285

(“§ 285”). Def.’s Mem. of L. in Supp. of Mot. for Att’y’s Fees (“Def.’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
Julia Karen Eisemann v. Miriam Greene, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
In Re: Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq., Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq. v. Jeffrey Sapir, Esq., as Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.