Legal Opinion

MGA Ins. Co., Inc. v. Goodsell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Insurer moved for summary judgment to enforce its household exclusion, which, purported to deny coverage to relatives residing with a permissive driver. The circuit court denied the motion and held the household exclusion void as a violation of public policy. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] Lorenzo and Angelica Sanchez purchased an automobile insurance policy from MGA Insurance Company (MGA). The policy covered the Sanchez’s 1989 Chevrolet Camaro with liability limits of $25,000 per person.

[¶ 3.] Gwen DuMarce and her son, Daniel, had been living with Sanchez’s brother, Escubio.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. BurdickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BordeauxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MirandaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API