Legal Opinion

State v. Bordeaux

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2006No. 23766PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Gerald Bordeaux appeals his conviction for driving or actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage (DUI). We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On the afternoon of October 4, 2004, a pedestrian on his way to a friend’s home in Sioux Falls observed a bicyclist repeatedly falling off of the bicycle he was attempting to ride on a city street. Suspecting that the bicyclist might be intoxicated and concerned for his safety, the pedestrian used a cell phone to contact law enforcement and report the matter. A law enforcement officer was dispatched to the location…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. NerisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. McKinneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. MossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. GarzaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. LaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Schwan v. BurgdorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API