Legal Opinion
Daas v. Pearson
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMilton Mollen, J.
Defendants Edgar Williams and E. J. Korvette, Inc. move to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency and for ‘ ‘ a farther order of severance. ’ ’ The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by James Daas (hereinafter referred to as “ plaintiff ”) and by his wife, Gloria Daas, for loss of consortium.
The allegations of the complaint, which, for the purpose of this motion, are to be deemed factually established, are as follows:
Plaintiff, a police officer, on duty on July 4, 1970 at approximately 4:00 p.m., while riding as a passenger in a New York City Police…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pagan v. GoldbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bucholtz v. Sirotkin Travel, Ltd.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
- Hurst v. TitusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. FieldsNassau County District Court · 1973
- Lawson v. StowColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.