Legal Opinion

Bucholtz v. Sirotkin Travel, Ltd.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 5, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memobandtjm. In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to cast defendant travel agency into damages for reservations that went awry. Since it is undisputed that the travel agency had utilized the services of a wholesaler who had put together a ‘ * package tour, ’ ’ defendant contends on this appeal that the wholesaler alone is liable for any default in performance.

Allocation of responsibility in the case before us should proceed upon the .principles of .agency law. In our opinion, where, as here, there is no proof of an independent relationship between *334the retail travel agent and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Steamship Co. v. SheahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Daas v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Friendly Hills Travel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Rookard v. MexicoachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Kupferman v. Pakistan International AirlinesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. Markland v. Travel Travel Southfield, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Ostrander v. Billie Holm's Village Travel, Inc.New York District Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API