Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fields

Nassau County District Court

Decided May 2, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Donovan, J.

The defendants are charged with violations of section 165.05 of the Penal Law.

Bach defendant moves to dismiss the information on the sole ground that it does not contain any nonhearsay evidence on the element of the crime: lack of consent of the owner.

*110Annexed to the information is a certified copy of the police teletype message from the New York City Police Department received by the Nassau County Police Department identifying the car in which the defendants were observed to be riding as one reported stolen to the New York City Police Department. The car is identified by make, year and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Daas v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. MeyersCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. People v. GiesaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Rodney J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. ConoscentiNew York District Court · 1975
  3. People v. Flushing Hospital & Medical CenterCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1983
  4. People v. AlvarezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  5. People v. SmithJustice Court of Town of Perinton · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API