Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Warner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1927No. 4318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action before the district court, sitting with a jury, on a promissory note due on or before January 1, 1920, for $3,000 with interest, and providing for reasonable attorney's fees in case of suit. The note was given by defendant to plaintiff in settlement for pure-bred cattle sold defendant. Defendant admits executing and delivering the note but denies there is anything due plaintiff, and in this connection sets up a counterclaim in the amount of $8,609.80, alleged as due defendant from plaintiff on account of an alleged breach of an implied warranty of a heifer sold defendant by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holt v. Spokane & Palouse Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Antler v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. McQuaid v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Young v. VannattaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Hargis ex rel. Hargis v. PaulsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Van's Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dent v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Nordick v. SorensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API