Legal Opinion

Nordick v. Sorensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1959No. 8633PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Plaintiffs seek redress in their first cause of action:(1) That plaintiffs be decreed a prior right against defendants to the use of 125 miner’s inches for irrigation purposes of the water of Gooseberry creek and its tributaries, situate in Bannock County, to which plaintiffs allege entitlement by reason of a prior decree, and(2) That defendants be held in contempt and punished accordingly for having willfully violated the trial court’s order restraining them from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of such decreed water.

Plaintiffs seek further redress in their second cause of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Anselmo v. BeardmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. In Re the Estates of DavenportIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Village of Peck v. DenisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Thomson v. MarksIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Watson v. WeickIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API