Legal Opinion
Dent v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1963No. 9248PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
Respondent Dent, as the administrator of the estate of Harry M. Williams, deceased, instituted this action against appellant Hardware Mutual Casualty Co., to recover on an automobile insurance policy issued Dr. Williams which contained, as one of its insuring agreements, the following:
“[The company agrees] To pay the principal sum stated in the policy declarations [$10,000] in the event of the death of the insured which shall result directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury caused by accident and sustained by the insured while in * * * an automobile *
T…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Holt v. Spokane & Palouse Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1895
- Antler v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Tulsa County Truck & Fruit Growers Ass'n v. McMurpheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Henderson v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Owen v. BurchamIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Henderson v. Cominco American, IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Ryals v. Broadbent Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Challis Irrigation Co. v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.