Legal Opinion
Fantasyland Video, Inc. v. County of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 2007No. 05-56026, 07-55033PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
In June 2002, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance to govern the operation of adult entertainment businesses within its jurisdiction, which covers the unincorporated portions of the county. The ordinance restricts the hours in which such businesses can operate, requires the removal of doors on peep show booths, and limits adult entertainment establishment to areas of the county zoned for industrial use. San Diego County’s stated rationale for the ordinance was to combat negative secondary effects — crime, disorderly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Tapper v. HearnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Alameda Books, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cruz v. Stein Strauss Trust 1361 (In Re Cruz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- NEW ALBANY DVD, LLC v. City of New Albany, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- 84 Video/newsstand, Inc. v. Thomas SartiniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.