Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 3, 2012No. 66852-8-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 — On a motion to enjoin operation of an adult cabaret for failure to comply with Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 23.47A.004(H), which requires a buffer zone between adult cabarets and areas used by children, the trial court properly decided the injunction motion as a matter of law when the facts were undisputed that a business application for the adult cabaret was not submitted before the ordinance was passed.
FACTS
¶2 On May 11, 2007, Robert Davis submitted an application to the city of Seattle’s (City) Revenue and Consumer Affairs Department for a general business license for the business…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Incorporated, T/a Warwick Books v. Prince George's County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Tk's Video, Inc. v. Denton County, Texas, Tk's Video, Inc. v. Denton County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Kev, Inc. v. Kitsap County and the Honorable Ray Aardal and John Horsley, County Commissioners of Kitsap, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SEIU Healthcare 775NW v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- City of Seattle v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- The Mcnaughton Group, Llc. v. Han Zin Park, Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014