Legal Opinion

Clausen v. Carstens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 17, 1986No. 16-82-00713; CA A36595PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment against them in favor of defendants Carstens and Gillis (defendants) in this action for wrongful receivership, malicious prosecution and other torts. We reverse and remand.

Defendants are lawyers. They represented defendant Sharon Clausen (Sharon) during a bitter dissolution of her marriage to plaintiff Albert Clausen (Albert). As part of that representation they obtained an ex parte order appointing a receiver of Albert’s interests in two corporations and other property and a restraining order against banks in which he and the corporations had accounts. The court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Giles v. Hill Lewis MarceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Yanney v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Bachmeier v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API