Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cox v. Wilson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1977No. CA 5046, SC 24821PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The State, acting through the Director of the Division of State Lands, brought this suit to enjoin the defendant from filling a portion of Five Mile Creek without first obtaining a permit. The trial court dismissed the Division’s complaint. The Court of Appeals reversed and held the defendant must secure a permit before filling the creek. 26 Or App 887, 554 P2d 529 (1976). We allowed the defendant’s petition for review.

The issue is whether a rule adopted by the Division is authorized by ORS 541.605(8). The rule is an interpretive rule as defined by ORS 183.310. ORS 183.400(2) provides that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Cox v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ReamsOregon Supreme Court · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API