Legal Opinion
City of Holdenville v. Kiser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1945No. 30722PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V.C.J.
The city of Holden-ville appeals from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, in favor of the plaintiffs, Susan T. Kiser and W. R. Kiser, for damages in the sum of $500 resulting from the maintenance of a temporary nuisance caused by the operation of the sewage disposal plant of the city. Two questions are presented for reversal, (1) the refusal to admit competent evidence offered by the city, and (2) the overruling of the city’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ evidence and its motion for a directed verdict.
The present action was commenced April 11, 1941. In 1935, the plaintiffs in a prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Oklahoma City v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Walker Drug Co. v. La Sal Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Ada v. CanoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- McKosky v. Town of TalihinaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Union Oil Co. v. HeinsohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.