Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. Heinsohn
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1994No. Nos. 92-6211, 92-6217, and 92-6240PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
These diversity proceedings began with an action brought by Union Oh Company for a declaratory judgment against Darrel D. Heinsohn and Kathy Heinsohn. It sought to determine whether Union Oh would be hable to the Heinsohns under the Oklahoma Surface Damages Act, Okla.Stat. tit. 52, §§ 318.2-.9 (1991), if it built and operated a sour gas processing plant in the NE/4 of Section 33 of a described township. The plant was to be built and was eventually built under the express authority of the provisions of an oil and gas lease obtained in 1967 from the surface and mineral owner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dennis Skinner, and Cross-Appellant v. Total Petroleum, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Oil Company of California, Cross-Appellee v. Darrel D. Heinsohn, an Individual, and Kathy Heinsohn, an Individual, Third-Party-Plaintiffs v. Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Third-Party Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Opinion No. (1997), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1997
- STATE OF OKLA. ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. STEPHENS AND JOHNSON OPERATING CO., INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- STATE OF OKLA. ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. STEPHENS AND JOHNSON OPERATING CO., INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020