Legal Opinion

City of Ada v. Canoy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1947No. Nos. 32507-32509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

These are separate actions brought by J. M. Canoy and wife, F. D. Hass and wife, and Mrs. Lela Farmer against the city of Ada for the recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of sewage from the city’s main sewer line backing into their homes and upon their premises through laterals connected thereto and overflowing their homes and premises, causing damage thereto.

The cases were consolidated for trial below. The pleadings in each case are the same. The evidence in one case is applicable to each and every other case. Separate verdicts were rendered and separate judgments…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Boyer v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City & County of Denver v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. City of Holdenville v. KiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Fletcher v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Basham v. City of CubaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. City of Holdenville v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Kizziar v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API