Walker Drug Co. v. La Sal Oil Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs Walker Drug Company, Inc., Jack Walker, and Lorraine Walker (collectively “the Walkers”)1 appeal from the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants La Sal Oil Company (“La Sal”) and Rio Vista Oil, Ltd. (“Rio Vista”). We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
“Before we recite the facts, we note that in reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Higgins v. Salt Lake County, 855 P.2d 231, 233 (Utah 1993). We state the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Walker Drug Co., Inc. v. La Sal Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
- Tanya Copier, Deceased, by and Through Bree Renee Lindsey, Her Personal Representative v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.