State v. Beardsley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Ramsey county, Bunn, J., of the offense stated in the opinion. From the judgment of conviction, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The defendant was indicted and convicted, under Laws 1895, c. 175, § 101, of the offense of assuming to act as the agent of an insurance company without first having procured a license or certificate of authority to so act.
That he solicited and secured the person named in the indictment to enter into a contract, a copy of which was made a part thereof, and that, as agent, he delivered it to the same person, is *21not disputed, so the principal question at issue is whether this ■ contract was one for insurance, within the meaning of the insurance code, above mentioned. Upon this question, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. McLachlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Seamans v. Christian Bros. Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Missouri, K. & T. Trust Co. v. KrumseigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WillettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- McCarty v. King County Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. v. Mortuary Assn., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Allin, Ins. Com. v. Motorists' Alliance of A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.