Legal Opinion

Seamans v. Christian Bros. Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 11, 1896No. Nos. 10,076-(27)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, in favor of defendant, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Smith, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The Wisconsin Mutual Fire Insurance Company is, as its name indicates, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin to carry on a mutual fire insurance business. It became-insolvent, and plaintiff was appointed receiver for it by the courts of that state. Defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of this state and doing business therein, procured from said insurance company a policy of insurance on its property situated in Minneapolis, in this state. This suit is brought to recover a balance of unpaid' premium claimed to be due on the policy. One of the defenses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Seamans v. Temple Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ganser v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Seamans v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bothwell v. Buckbee-Mears CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  3. Swedish-American National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Langworthy v. GardingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API