Legal Opinion
McCarty v. King County Medical Service Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1946No. 29889PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnelly, J.
Plaintiffs, McCarty and wife, instituted the present action, naming as defendants King County Medical Service Corporation and Dr. Herbert C. Ostrom, as its medical director, and Seattle General hospital, a corporation.
The first cause of action set forth in plaintiffs’ complaint is against the King County Medical Service Corporation and Dr. Ostrom and seeks the recovery of $442.50 which plaintiffs had personally paid for special nurses’ services during Mrs. McCarty’s period of hospitalization for injuries sustained by her in a fall down an elevator shaft in the Chamber of Commerce building in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Handley v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Merchants National Bank v. FrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- George L. Stansifer, Dba Lakewood Sports Cars v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, and J. O. Fisher Corporation (Jim Fisher Motors)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Sutton Ex Rel. SuttonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Randa v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.