United States v. Mantooth
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Brosman, Judge:
Mantooth, the appellant before us, was charged with carnal knowledge of the person of one Sieglinde B., in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 120, 50 USC § 714. The *253general court-martial which tried him returned findings of guilty and sentenced him to receive a bad-conduct discharge, as well as to total forfeitures and confinement at hard labor for two years. After approval by the convening authority and affirmance by a board of review, we granted the accused’s petition to enable us to consider whether the law officer erred in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Loose v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. AllumsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. SikorskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. FlippenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. SandovalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. GoodmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.