Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sandoval

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 18, 1984No. 40,717; CM 439327PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officers sitting at Fort Hood, Texas, convicted appellant of a charge of conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman, in violation of Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 933. The single specification alleged that he “did ... wrongfully commit an indecent, lewd, and lascivious act with Specialist Five Mariko H. Anso, by kissing her, putting his fingers on her chest and placing his fingers under her panties.” Appellant was sentenced to dismissal, and the convening authority approved the findings…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. William RubinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Lynette Burnette, United States of America v. Theresa Burnette, United States of America v. Michael Curtis BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. LeMereUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. CameronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. McCaskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. HurstUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API