Legal Opinion

United States v. Sikorski

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 28, 1972No. 24,573PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Judge:

In the first of three assignments of error, the accused alleges that affirmance by the Court of Military Review of certain findings of guilty is irreconcilable with its disapproval of other findings of guilty by a general court-martial convened in the Republic of Vietnam.

As the case came to the United States Navy Court of Military Review, the accused stood convicted of separate charges of conspiracy to commit robbery and murder (Charge I and its specification), unpremeditated murder of an unknown Vietnamese male (Charge II, specification 1), commission of a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. RemeleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. BearchildUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. WolfordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. WalkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API