Legal Opinion

Providence Health System v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 2012No. 0900276; A145132PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In this workers’ compensation proceeding, we are asked to resolve three issues: (1) whether employer was obligated under ORS 656.262(7)(c)1 to reopen and process claimant’s omitted condition claims after an administrative law judge (ALJ) had found the conditions compensable but while employer’s appeal of the ALJ order was pending; (2) if employer was so obligated, whether employer fulfilled those obligations; and (3) if employer was so obligated but did not fulfill its obligations, whether claimant is entitled to attorney fees and a penalty because employer lacked legitimate doubt about its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brown v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. International Paper Co. v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Sundermier v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Walker v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Tseng v. TsengCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API