Legal Opinion
Research Frontiers Inc. v. Marks Polarized Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1968No. 67 Civ. 1149PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JUDD, District Judge.
A motion to dismiss the complaint raises the question whether plaintiff has stated a claim for infringement of patents of which it is the exclusive licensee, or merely a claim for breach of the license agreements.
The complaint recites that plaintiff holds exclusive licenses from defendants to make, use and sell products and processes embodying inventions covered by certain patents. The agreements name twenty-one United States patents and twenty-five applications for United States patents relating to the polarization of light and other fields…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanofi, S.A. v. Med-Tech Veterinarian Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- Thompson Tool Co., Inc. v. RosenbaumDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Dreamlite Holdings Ltd. v. KraserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Mission I-Tech Hockey Ltd. v. Oakley, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.