Thompson Tool Co., Inc. v. Rosenbaum
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DALY, District Judge.
Three defendants have moved for dismissal in two separate motions. The second motion filed by defendant Rosenbaum also contains a motion for summary judgment. All motions are denied.
Plaintiff’s complaint contains five counts. The first count alleges infringement of patent No. 3,958,294 in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 281 (1970). This count is based on the allegation that the plaintiff found tools which simulated its patented device in the hands of the defendants’ customers. The second count alleges a breach of contract. 1 Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- United States Surgical Corp. v. Hospital Products International Pty. Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Vespa of America Corp. v. Bajaj Auto Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Friedman, Eisenstein, Raemer & Schwartz v. AftermanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984