Legal Opinion
A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 27, 1967No. 373, Docket 31028PublishedCited by 261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue presented for our disposition is whether Judge Bonsai properly concluded that the District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the complaint brought by A. T. Brod & Co. (Brod) against Jack and Adele Per-low (Perlows), the appellees. Brod, a member of the New York Stock Exchange brought its complaint under § 10 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, and sought monetary damages to compensate for the losses it suffered as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.