Mission I-Tech Hockey Ltd. v. Oakley, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (15-1) AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE (15-2)
PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action arises from a Settlement and License Agreement between Plaintiff Mission I-Tech Hockey Ltd.’s (hereafter “Plaintiff’ or “Mission”) predecessor and Defendant Oakley, Inc. (hereafter “Defendant” or “Oakley”) in case number 01-2374, a case previously litigated in this Court (hereafter “the Oakley case”). In the Oakley case, on February 18, 2003, the parties agreed that the undersigned would have jurisdiction to decide,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bangkok Broadcasting & T v. Co. v. IPTV Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010