Legal Opinion
Dreamlite Holdings Ltd. v. Kraser
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 14, 1988No. 88 C 2957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action asserting claims under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (1982), and pendent common law claims. The complaint alleges that Gary S. Eraser (Eraser) has infringed or is about to infringe United States Patent No. 4,522,-583 (the Patent), to which plaintiff Dream-lite Holdings Ltd. (Dreamlite) has exclusive rights. The claims of the Patent cover a pocket cigarette lighter in the shape of a miniature automobile.
Plaintiffs moved by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendants from making, using, or selling any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Diamond Scientific Co. v. Ambico, Inc. And Clarence Joseph WelterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sanofi, S.A. v. Med-Tech Veterinarian Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. American Printers and LithographersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dreamlite Holdings Ltd. v. KraserCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mission I-Tech Hockey Ltd. v. Oakley, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Dreamlite Holdings Limited v. Gary S. KraserCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989