Legal Opinion

Francisco v. Parchment Medical Clinic, PC

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1979No. Docket 62496PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The question is whether the trial court reversibly disallowed expert testimony on the standard of care required of a surgeon treating breast cancer and fibrocystitis because the expert was unfamiliar with the practice in Kalamazoo or similar communities.

In June, 1974, plaintiffs Ethel and Merton Francisco filed a complaint alleging that defendant Parchment Medical Clinic was liable for damages because of breach of contract and medical malpractice. The activities complained of centered upon the actions of two of defendant’s doctors, general practitioner Hoekstra and general surgeon Hammer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Naccarato v. GrobMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Fortner v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. McPherson Community Health CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  3. Strach v. St. John Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Swanek v. Hutzel HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Bahr v. Harper-Grace HospitalsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API