Legal Opinion

Midwest Transfer Co. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1968No. Nos. 41206 and 41207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Section 5728.10, Revised Code, provides, among other things:

“In the event any person required to file a highway use tax return * * * files an incorrect return * * * for the period covered by the réturn, the Tax Commissioner may make an assessment against such person, based upon any information in his possession, for the period for which such tax was due.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Because of the improper system of reporting used by the appellees, the Tax Commissioner became convinced that appellees had substantially underreported the mileage traveled over Ohio highways by their motor vehicles which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Russo v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Global Knowledge Training, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Nusseibeh v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API