Rumpke Container Service, Inc. v. Zaino
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Appellant Rumpke Container Service, Inc. (“Rumpke”) has filed applications for refund and reassessment of sales and use taxes. Additional appellants Rumpke Iron Works, Inc., Marathon Equipment Company, Hershell McIntosh and Gary Patton, d.b.a. Arcanum Container and Repair, Environmental Steel Products, Inc., Miami Valley International Trucks, Inc., Truck & Parts of Tampa, Inc., and Tri-State Ford Truck Sales, Inc., have filed applications on Rumpke’s behalf for refund of the sales and use taxes that Rumpke paid on purchases.
Rumpke is in the business of collecting and transporting waste,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- N.A.T. Transp., Inc. v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Wilson v. IESI N.Y. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Rumpke Container Serv., Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Karr v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022