Legal Opinion
Greenebaum v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1984No. Civ. 68931PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GUTIERREZ, J. *
A petition for a writ of mandate was filed by tenants of an apartment building located at 514-524 South Barrington Avenue in the City of Los Angeles. The City of Los Angeles had approved tentative tract No. 39860, proposed by the real party in interest, for the construction of 24 new condominium units on the Barrington property.
After appearing and being heard at various administrative hearings regarding the proposed development, the tenants brought the instant lawsuit to overturn the approval of the tentative tract map. This is an appeal from a judgment by the superior…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Coastside County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- San Francisco Ecology Center v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- ASS'N OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.