Duroth Manufacturing Co. v. Cauffiel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 233, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Cambria Co., September T., 19.11, No. 170, in case of Duroth Manufacturing Company v. Joseph Cauffiel. Replevin for the recovery of stocks and bonds. Before Stephens, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for the property in suit and for $2,600 damages for detention, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 233, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Cambria Co., September T., 19.11, No. 170, in case of Duroth Manufacturing Company v. Joseph Cauffiel. Replevin for the recovery of stocks and bonds. Before Stephens, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for the property in suit and for $2,600 damages for detention, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned, among others, were various rulings on evidence, various instructions to the jury and answers to points. The plaintiff being an unregistered foreign corporation is…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Moschziskee,
This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment entered against him in an action of replevin, wherein a recovery was allowed for the value of certain bonds and stock found by the verdict to belong to the plaintiff, an unregistered foreign corporation. The jury fixed the value of the property at $5,000 and gave $2,600 damages for detention. Although there was a conflict in the testimony on some of the points, yet, in view of the verdict, and since there was evidence sufficient for the purpose, we must take as established the following material facts contended…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Industrial General Trust, Ltd. v. . TodNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Murray v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Redding v. GodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Herdic v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Engle v. Capital Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Rex Beach Pictures Co. v. Harry I. Garson ProductionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Gaspero v. GentileSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.