Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Caiazzo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1989No. 874PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellants, Anthony and Josephine Caiazzo, appeal from an order sustaining the preliminary objections of appellee, Ford Motor Credit Corporation, and dismissing the Caiazzo’s answer, new matter, and counterclaim. The trial court, applying this Court’s decision in Ford Motor Credit Corp. v. Dunsmore, 374 Pa.Super. 303, 542 A.2d 1033 (1988), reasoned that Caiazzos’ claims were not properly cognizable in this replevin action. We find Ford Motor Credit Corp. v. Dunsmore, supra, materially distinguishable based upon appellant’s assertion of a purchase money security interest under 13…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Mahoney v. FurchesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. International Electronics Co. v. N. S. T. Metal Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Towers South Condominium v. Ron-Ike Foam Insulators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Foflygen v. R. ZEMEL, MD (PC)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Northrop Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Litronic Industries, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API