Legal Opinion

Moran Bros. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 14, 1925No. 30498PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of a battleship designated “ Battleship No. 14, Nebraska.” A copy of the contract, which bore date as of March 7, 1901, is attached to the original petition. It refers, for authority for the construction of this and other battleships, to the appropriation acts of March 3, 1899, and June 7, 1900 (30 Stat. 1024, 1044, and 31 Stat. 684, 706), and both of these, by appropriate references, adopt the provisions of the act of August 3, 1886 (24 Stat. 215), which, in section 7, prescribes certain conditions relative to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Kehm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Rust Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API